My 180 on Gay Marriage

Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 11.25.02 AM

Photo Credit:  Gardner Edmunds

“An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity.”

                                              -Martin Luther King, Jr.

We were sitting at a small table near the window of a bustling indian restaurant, my mother, my brother and I.  It had been just over a year since I had told my parents that my brother was gay. The revelation was like approaching the edge of an enormous waterfall… desperate attempts to paddle backward, away from the edge, the mounting fear of what would happen… and the fall.  It had been a year of resistance, free-falling, drowning, and fighting.  I looked at my brother, a person I have loved ferociously since he was born, a boy I felt inexplicably bonded to by unseen strings.  I saw a young man I adored for his humor, his gorgeous smile, his great dance moves, his peaceful wisdom, his creative spirit, his enormous generosity, his ability to make every person he is with feel truly seen.  I felt there was nothing I would not do for my brother.   Sitting there, with our mother, whose love and pride for her son emanated from her in almost palpable waves, we ate our navrattan korma and samosas. The subject of marriage and family somehow invaded our pleasant bubble.

And then I bravely told my brother.

My belief came thickly wrapped with true regret and remorse, as if it could insulate him from receiving the cold, hard center.  I did not believe gay people should be allowed to marry.  I saw the sharp, focused pain in his eyes, but he remained still in his seat, his eyes luminous with my rejection.  I looked away, unable to bear his sadness.  I looked at my mother, who sat quietly, not quite ready to voice her agreement with me, but not disagreeing either.

I felt sad for him, and I felt the loss for him… the loss of his future spouse, the loss of the family life I was in the midst of building with the love of my life.

I remembered him as a baby…his sparkling, joyful eyes, his dimpled knees, his fat cheeks.  It was a sharp undoing… a death.  The  knowing that he would never have a son or daughter  with his tenderness and infectious smile.   The situation was terribly painful, and I gulped back some ice water, trying to swallow my need to weep for our family situation.  Disbelief that this was really happening… that we were really being asked to deal with such an awful dilemma, crept up my throat.  It often did, when we talked about my brother being gay.  A sort of disconnect, that kind of out-of-body feeling that comes from true desperation, the need to escape even being.

I tried to let my love for him radiate through my presence, I wanted him to feel it.  I tried to gather it up in a huge, tight ball and coat him in it.  I wanted him to feel my love with same aching presence as I did.  To know that I would give my life for him, my love was that great.  I wanted him to understand that this one, small difference of opinion would not affect our relationship. We were stronger than that.  It would not influence our ability to be a support for each other.  We would overcome it, transcend it.

It need not define us.

The trouble was, my sense of morality, my belief…was bigger than just one sister and one brother.  I knew that one must not allow the pain of our situation cloud the greater picture of what is right and what is wrong.  My belief was Global.  Natural.  Social.  And in support of God.  My love for Gardner was bigger than I was.  But I must stand in protection of the greater good.

Tradition and family and children and GOD HIMSELF must be held in protection.

If I were to falter, to waver in my faith and love of Jesus Christ himself, to  acquiesce to this painful moment, I would crumble into a million pieces and blow away.    If I conceded on this moral stance, if I overlooked the fact that God created MAN and WOMAN, if I turned a blind eye to scripture, if I denied the reality that sex was ultimately designed for procreation and homosexual sex is therefore not supportive of a natural order…

I may as well dissolve all of my beliefs.  I may as well set fire to all that I knew to be true, and in turn, my very identity would turn to ash.

It was for these very good reasons that I sat at that table in 2005 and admitted to a brother that I adored that I could not support his right to marry another man.  Or have children.   I had to take a stand. For God.  For my children.  For my faith.

For my SELF.

My identity  was 100% invested as a person who was strong enough to suffer any amount of pressure and pain from outside sources, as long as I was being true to my God, and therefore honoring my own values.

I left this agonizing night throbbing in pain.  I was completely absorbed by the ache in my heart.  Despite carefully avoiding his eyes, I could still feel the grief radiating from my brother.   From my mother.  We were drowning at the bottom of the waterfall, unable to find the surface, take a breath.  Back at the house, I cradled my sweet infant daughter and wept.  She fed, and I could no longer hold in the flood of emotion.  The toll on my spirit was undefinable.  Taking a stand for what I believe in was at great cost to my mental, emotional, and physical body.

I did it not because I was cruel or flippant or uncaring.  I did it not because I was incapable of love.  I did it because it was the only way I felt I could maintain my moral integrity.

My moral integrity defines me.  There is no characteristic, no action, no feeling more important.  I have been driven by this one identifying principle my entire life.  I could not sacrifice that sense of integrity, it makes me whole and gives meaning to each breath I take .

in·teg·ri·ty

[in-teg-ri-tee]

noun

1.  adherence to moral and ethical principles; soundness of moral character; honesty.

2.  the state of being whole, entire, or undiminished

3.  a sound, unimpaired, or perfect condition

I was consumed by my desire for him to validate my love for him, feel my intent, and understand my inability to offer him more.  I truly did believe that if he had as much love and respect for me as I did for him, he would not ask this of me.  He would not ask me to sacrifice my moral integrity for him.

I could see his pain.  I could feel his pain.

Could he see mine?

Could he tell how much it hurt me, to see him suffering?

Could he see how this wasn’t easy for me?

The only way out of the mess was to simply agree to disagree.  Agree to share a relationship of love and respect and kindness.  I would support him in every way that I could, but he would not ask me to compromise myself.  Because that is not what love is.  Mutual love requires that we both offer up what we can, and respect the places that we can’t. I wanted him to love me as much as I loved him.

And he did.

As pure as I believed my offering of love was for my brother, as impossible as the situation seemed to me, as visceral and real as it pained me to maintain my integrity, there was one element that prevailed.  An element that spoiled the whole exchange. Unbeknownst to me, it tainted my offering of love.

I was being selfish. Self-centered.  Self-protective.

I was blinded by my very real need to preserve my sense of self. I was demanding that my brother see my dilemma, my pain, my guilt, my intent.  And in all that, I did not see him.

My, my, my.

I was failing to recognize this selfishness, because I was so consumed by the threatening request to examine my beliefs.  It is not an easy or comfortable undertaking, and I clearly spent a good amount of time insulating myself from the true discomfort that comes from doing an autopsy on my own moral character.  What I was failing to recognize, in my fear, is the fallibility of some moral choices.  I was so caught up in my own fear and hurt, I was unable to clearly see that some moral choices can safely evolve.

These evolutions end up magnifying the principles that I care most about.  Love, charity, generosity, forgiveness, respect.   There are countless examples in history of decisions and choices made with moral intent that have soften and changed and evolved for the greater good over time.   While the intent may not be filled with malice, some moral choices are driven by fear rather than love.

The result is that instead of building upon the good and magnificent in human nature, creating more unity and peace in the world, highlighting beauty and divinity that exists in every person, these moral stands disintegrate and divide.  They cause undue pain and anguish in our fellow human beings.  The kinds of choices in the name of God and morality that result in families disowning their children, cruelty and bullying… they need to be examined.   When children are taking their own life at the hands of our moral integrity, it is time that we ask ourselves if this is not unlike other dark points in history that we now look upon with regret and shame.

People against gay marriage take enormous offense to the comparison of gay rights to the civil rights movement.  They can’t stand the correlation that is made between the discrimination and bigotry imposed on black people and the treatment of gay people today.  I was one of those people.  In that restaurant, with the sting of my morality shining bright in his eyes, by brother calmly and lovingly tried to make these associations for me.

They fell on deaf ears.

Words like “discriminate” and “bigot” and “prejudice” are words filled with hate and a long history of cruelty.  It was unbearable for me to hear him say these words, when I was defending my integrity.  And I loved him.  There is no room for love and prejudice in the same sentence.  In the same room.  So, there was no way that he deserved to be using those words with me.

The fact that it was intolerable to me did not make it less true.

The similarity lies in how it makes people feel, and in turn the climate of acceptance and love it creates for people.

Black people had a seat on the bus.  They were allowed to ride… so why did they care where we made them sit?    (Why can’t they be happy with civil unions?)

Black children had schools.  So why did they want to go to the same school as the white children?  (It’s not like we don’t love you.  We just can’t have your family visible to my family.)

 Black people were provided a place to go to the bathroom.  What was the big deal in making them go somewhere outside the home they worked in?   (Fine.  Get married.  But not in my state!)

They were loved and trusted and cared for and provided for.  I am sure that they were genuinely loved by some of the white people in their lives, their employers, their fellow christians.

But it didn’t matter.

Nothing at all mattered, when they were still being treated as second class citizens.  Drinking out of the same drinking fountain is not a matter of law, it’s a matter of love.  Of equality.  The similarity lies in the message,

“There is something about you that is not as deserving.”

When we are willing to treat a whole group of our fellow citizens with this mindset, we are not only withholding something precious and respectful from them, we are creating a social climate where people feel more justified in participating in unjustifiable acts.

I am a loving sister, a person so sensitive I would never, ever dream of saying terrible, hateful things to anyone. But I was standing with a group of people, who to this day are innocently defending  their position with things like:

“I have never, ever had feelings of hate, bigotry or discrimination against anyone homosexual, and I honestly don’t know many people that do. Although I’m sure they are out there, which is really sad,”

or

“ I don’t condone bullying ever, on either side of this issue. Love and understanding is the best in all cases.”

Just like me in that restaurant, these well-meaning people are simply not examining reality.  We condone hate, bigotry, and discrimination when we are willing to participate in the creation of  second class citizens in our country.  It matters not what your intent is.  Your love.  What matters, is your participation in creating a superior class, ranking people’s worthiness, placing your self above others in the eyes of the law.

There are some things that we can not agree to disagree upon.  And basic human rights should be one of those.  We do not “agree to disagree” on matters of justice, of equality, of freedom, of safety, of dignity and respect for every human being born on this earth.

To me, at that restaraunt, marriage was the final piece of my conviction I would not allow my brother to take.  I had come so far, but I had to draw the line.  And I wanted him to respect that.  But I had it backwards.  To achieve mutual respect, there must be equality first.  Always.  There are not enough loving acts to overcome the indignity of unequal human rights.

It is the first and most crucial piece we must hand over.

I know that most of the people that oppose gay marriage are kind, caring people.  They wouldn’t dream of hurting someone.  They wouldn’t dream of using hate speech or violence.  They are the people that would give the shirt off their backs, offer a hug when it was warranted, be the first in line to volunteer help when it was needed … gay or straight.  I know this, because I was that person.

 My moral integrity was in fact, in grave danger.  Because I was willing to look my brother in the eye and communicate to him that he was a second class citizen.  A person undeserving of something I held sacred and precious.

Marriage was a right I would afford to anyone at all, with any motive, as long as it were two people with the proper body parts.

Screen Shot 2014-03-13 at 11.39.31 AM

 I was willing to condone the mistreatment of gay people, by drawing a clear, bright line between us, that seperated us as dignified, and undignified, and in the name of Jesus Christ …whom would never do such a thing.  I did it for selfish reasons.  Because I was too scared to dissect my own moral character, and find that there were cancerous pieces that needed discarding.

In the end, I left my religion.  As did my mother, father and married brother.  This looks like an awesome step in solidarity.  This looks like we were willing to toss our moral integrity into a blender, and flip the switch.  But I can assure you, walking away from one’s religious beliefs, culture, and family security is not that simple.

It is also entirely possible  to support  the LBGT community and maintain your faith within your religious practice.  It will not shatter you, it is a step toward a true practice of Christ-like acceptance.  Our moral integrity is compromised when we confiscate from others that which is not ours to take.  We can practice our religions, apply our moral standards, draw firm lines around what is acceptable, and unacceptable.  Each of us can decide if homosexuality is a sin, a choice, an abomination.  We can preach it to our children, our neighbors, from the pulpit of our churches.  But we can not and should not willingly create a country that does not serve the rights of all. The LGBT community deserves dignity, respect, and equality because they are human beings, created equal.

The rest is a matter of opinion, and we can agree to disagree.

224611_946489250969_6166327_n

18 thoughts on “My 180 on Gay Marriage

  1. You simply gave up on religion/God over satisfying someone’s selfish,earthy desires, and lust? A true believer won’t do such a thing. The creator and your faith comes beforehand; before everything including your own brother. I’m not hating on him, nor do I believe I have the right to do so, but if you’ll give up such morality and think of it “backward” and a thing of the past, then you never believed in it in the first place. Marriage from the beginning was ensured under the union of a man and a woman, that’s been the root definition of marriage for thousands of years. There is nothing that can change that fact, and instituting to change its meaning to fit ones agenda and desire is nothing less of selfishness and I dare to say don’t compare nor use as example what the black people went through to the struggle of the gays and lesbians of this nation. It’s an insult to the African Americans and other minorities in this country.You talked about equality. Respecting people and who they are as a person. Why cant the gays and lesbians of this nation respect us and understand that the definition of marriage wont be bend and reconstructed to fit their world view because all of the sudden they have a change of heart to what marriage is supposed to be. We will respect their wish to love one another and do as they wish, except call it marriage. How about a civil union? how about a union? Why marriage? We have our equal rights to have a say on what is considered marriage, don’t we? Leave tradition marriage alone. The double standards of this nation is real and quite hysterical. Remember, it’s not your brothers love that will save you from hell, it’s your savior. It’s sad that you changed your mind on such fundamental issue. You could have loved your brother and still be against the sinful acts of your brother or your parents or anyone else. Giving up is such a a lazy thing to do. You can love all humans equally and keep your faith. What a waste.

      • You are so very welcome, you truly deserve many kudos! I am reading your other blog about you and your brother and have been sharing these on my Facebook, which is where I found the first one. I love reading your thought process throughout everything that you have been through along the way. I am a gay man that has been “out” for over 20 years, but growing up from a large devout Catholic family and being from a small rural town certainly dished up challenges. I have had a rough go of it over the years at times from all aspects of life but I am proud to say that I have a partner of over 15 years, own a small business and we are very excited to one day soon be wed together. We are just waiting on Michigan to come around. Anyway, I appreciate reading about your thought process as I am sure it is similar to those thoughts that have flowed through the minds of people close to me. Thank you for making a difference.

      • You are so welcome. I’m glad to hear you are happy and doing so well and thanks for sharing my writing. I care so much about helping people reach a better understanding of what love can be. I will think of you when Michigan flips!

  2. I want to make a distinction between a skin color and an ethnic heritage and a moral act. They are different, you’re mixing skin color and ethnic origin with a sexual activity and they’re different kinds of things.
    The moral confusion in this post is first of all the inability to distinguish between ethnic origin and ethical conduct, between skin color and sexual conduct between what you consider sin, love, right or wrong and what God says.

    • Sexual orientation is not a moral choice, just as you did not decide based on morality to be heterosexual. It simply is.

      Here is the important distinction you are missing: sexual activity has little to do with being gay or straight. It is not about sex in the exact same way every loving partnership is so much more than a sex act. It’s time to take your thinking and your empathy past the most basic stage and understand human relationships. There is no important difference between a straight person and a gay person. We all want love, affection, connection and respect.
      The debate is not about a sex act. It’s about love.

  3. Stumbled on your blog and liked some of it, but this post shows a complete lack of understanding of theology or true Christianity.You say:
    It is also entirely possible to support the LBGT community and maintain your faith within your religious practice. It will not shatter you, it is a step toward a true practice of Christ-like acceptance.

    You couldn’t be more wrong. If you are a believer, meaning that you actually believe what the Bible says, you know that no where in it does Christ say accept the sinner AND the sin. If fact, when the Pharisees tried to get Jesus to hate on a sinner (the woman caught in the act of adultery) and execute justice (stoning), He exhibited love for the person BUT intolerance of her sin. He told her “I do not condemn, go and SIN NO MORE”. He didn’t say, “Oh, you were cheating on your spouse with another man, it’s ok if you really love the person.”

    So, what you have really done is not a 180 on the redefinition of marriage but a 180 on your faith. I’m sad for you.

    • I believe that Jesus taught to not judge. That Christians recognize that we are all sinners. It’s not your job to point a finger or cast a stone. Worry about your own sin. And be loving. That is truly the Christian way. God will be the judge… If we all worry more about how we love rather than making cruel judgement that is not our job, the world would be a more Christ-like. The story you tell is of Jesus Christ telling someone to sin no more. I don’t believe that is your assignment. Choose love. And kindness. And family. And stability. And acceptance. And grace. Leave the rest for your God.

      • Honestly, I fully expect this to fall on deaf ears, but I’m hoping you prayerfully consider this. Regarding your comment, “It’s not your job to point a finger or cast a stone,” your understanding of what God expects from Christians regarding judgment is much too narrow. Most of the world and many Christians have taken scripture’s exhortation to not judge too broadly without understanding scriptural context.

        In Matthew 7:1, which is probably the most mis-quoted verse by those seeking to promote tolerance, when Jesus says, “Judge not, lest you be judged”, He then follows it in verses 2-5, with the reason – if you are committing the same sin, you should not be pointing that sin out in others. But if you have that area of your life under control, then you can (and should) help your brother also gain victory in that area. He doesn’t say that you should accept their sin, but that you should first work on yourself so that you CAN help your brother stop sinning (Verse 5). Just a few verses later, in Matthew 7:15-20, He makes it abundantly clear that we are to judge others of faith by their deeds and fruit to discern if they are promoting false teachings. Redefining marriage is definitely a false teaching.

        In John 7, Jesus also makes another point about judgment. After healing someone on the Sabbath, the pharisees went all ape-crazy on Him because he “worked” on the Sabbath. He tells the pharisees to stop judging by appearances but to make right judgments, meaning judgment based on whether or not someone is actually breaking the spirit of the law, not whether they are breaking your personal interpretation. In this case, scripture makes it abundantly clear that homosexuality is wrong in God’s eyes(see Romans 1:22-27), not just some narrow bigoted segment who don’t want gays to experience love.

        Regarding your comment, “The story you tell is of Jesus Christ telling someone to sin no more. I don’t believe that is your assignment. Choose love.” Other areas of scripture also make it clear that the church is responsible for judging those within to extreme levels that go way past just telling someone not to sin. I Corinthians 5 even points out that the church body is supposed to purge those who practice sexual immorality from their presence, if that person is unwilling to repent. II Timothy 2:24-26 completely counters your point – “In humility CORRECTING those who are in opposition, if God perhaps will grant them repentance….and that they may come to their senses and escape the snare of the devil”. Finally in Luke 24, Jesus told the disciples (and us) that we are to preach in Jesus name to all nations repentance and remission of sins. What is repentance but telling someone that they are sinning and need to turn from it? Which is more loving? To tell someone that they are in dire peril (with the chance that they may hate and reject you for it) or knowing that they are pursuing a dangerous course but for the sake of harmony and tolerance, not telling them so? Personally, I would hope that my friends and family would love me enough to tell me if I was so blind to my own actions that were in clear contradiction of scripture that I was in danger of damaging my witness or leading others astray.

        Happy Easter!

      • Thanks for the Easter sermon. I simply don’t believe that ranking oneself as more righteous and less sinful is the loving way. We obviously differ greatly in our approach to loving one another. We all have our own life to handle, decisions to make, happiness to pursue. And I find that being forgiving and loving and accepting… The loving attributes I hope others show me, is the peaceful and kind way. I support love, in all forms. love.

      • Like I said deaf ears. I never said anything about ranking myself as more righteous. We are all sinners, condemned to die, but for the grace of God and faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus. Yet scripture makes it clear that the sinner is supposed to turn from their sin, whether that is alcoholism, adultery, lying, stealing, homosexuality, hatred, pride, etc. We are all guilty of at least one of them, but God doesn’t tell us some sins are acceptable because they’re about love or because it’s mean to be intolerant. He didn’t send His Son to die a horrific, brutal death on the cross simply so that you, me or our loved ones could stay the way we are. He came to change us. If we aren’t willing to change, then maybe we truly don’t believe.

        As for being accepting, you can accept a person without approving of their sinful choices (whether that be homosexuality, cheating on their spouse or just being a rude jerk all the time). I have had homosexual friends who knew that I believed exactly what the Bible said and wasn’t willing to re-interpret so that they could feel good about themselves. But I treated them respectfully and we got along fine. And they knew they were never going to get my approval that redefining marriage to mean anything other than what scripture defines was going to happen.

        With that, I’m finished discussing this with you and you can have the final word.

  4. Thank you so much for this. I’ve been perusing your blog after you posted about Disney (WOW…I’ll keep it to The Cosby Show, thank you very much) and have found a lot of my own thoughts mirrored in yours. I recently let my religious bubble know my stance on this same issue, and it was a huge step for me. HUGE. It’s nice to know there are others that feel the same and come from a similar background. If you are wondering: http://www.mylifeinverbs.com/2014/03/im-coming-outand-im-straight.html

    Thanks again for your raw honesty. It’s hard to do, but important.

  5. After your post on Disney, I like the one before me, have been perusing your blog. This one interested me as it is a very important discussion for the Christian community to have. Also, you are a very talented writer.
    I pray that the Holy Spirit speak to you on this subject and that your eyes be opened to truth of God and His Word. Recently, I have been analyzing the arguments for supporting gay marriage. I have friends who are gay and love them. They know where I stand. But the argument for gay marriage doesn’t compute. To argue a point one must be able to use that same argument in other similar contexts. The “because they love each other” or “because it is a moral issue” doesn’t work. Moral issues like having more than one wife, pornography, or having sex with an animal, why can’t I marry my dog? or wife swapping. Where do you draw the line? It is possible to love and respect people in the gay lifestyle and accept them as a person without condoning the sin and especially not supporting the gay agenda in our nation. Also, if I was a drunkard or a thief and decided that as long as I wasn’t hurting anyone but myself that my sin is ok and everyone should support me. Would that mean that I would still go to heaven if my lifestyle never changed?
    Lastly, no one is “born that way”. Science never could find the gay gene. And has now discovered that DNA expression is influenced by environment. We make a choice based on our experiences, traumas, perspectives. I have sin in my life that may be hard to overcome and I can say I can’t help it or I was born that way. But truth is that we are all born into sin with a propensity to follow the lusts of the flesh.
    I pray for your brother. He needs Christ in his life. He needs healing and to know the amazing grace and love of Jesus Christ. I pray for his eyes to be open and for him to feel God tugging at his heart. I pray for someone to love him enough to pray for him and speak to him in love and in truth. He is valuable. So much so that Jesus died for him. I pray he sees himself as God sees him. That is an amazing man, created in the image of God, with a purpose and a plan, that loves him more than life itself.
    I hope he realizes he has an enemy that seeks to steal his God-given identity, to rob him of lasting peace, joy and everlasting life. The short time we have on earth in trade for eternity is not worth any lust of the flesh.

    1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.

    2 Corinthians 11:3, James 1:8,

    2 Corinthians 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. V5 For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord, and ourselves your servants for Jesus’ sake.

    With love and blessing to you,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s